Street cleaner with 40+ years' service loses constructive dismissal claim filed a year late
A street cleaner who was pressured to resign on his 66th birthday had his constructive dismissal claim dismissed because he filed it almost a year late. The tribunal said it had no jurisdiction to hear the case.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #age-discrimination
- #constructive-dismissal
- #out-of-time
- #pressure-to-resign
- #retirement
- #street-cleaner
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as a street cleaner for over 40 years, transferred to the respondent in 2011.
- His employment ended on 7 July 2021, his 66th birthday, after he was pressured to write a resignation letter.
- The claimant presented his claim by post on 6 July 2022, almost a year after the effective date of termination.
- The claimant's brother, who assisted him, had previous tribunal experience and was aware of time limits.
- The claim form was initially sent to the wrong office with insufficient postage, causing further delay.
Timeline
-
Pension letter received
The claimant received a letter from the respondent's pension administrator stating he was due to retire on his 66th birthday.
-
Pressured to resign
The claimant's manager Raphael showed him a letter and told him to write 'I, Tony Phillips, want to retire on 7/7/21' and sign it, which he did.
-
Resignation accepted
The claimant received a letter from the respondent accepting his resignation.
-
Employment ended
The claimant's employment ended on his 66th birthday.
-
Early conciliation started (first certificate)
Early conciliation period began, lasting from 9 to 24 September 2021.
-
Early conciliation started (second certificate)
Another early conciliation period began, lasting from 4 October to 12 November 2021.
-
Claim presented
The claimant presented his claim by post to the Employment Tribunal Central Office in Leicester.
-
Preliminary hearing
A hybrid hearing was held to determine whether the tribunal had jurisdiction due to time limits.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether it could hear complaints of unfair constructive dismissal and age discrimination when the claim was presented almost a year after the employment ended, far beyond the usual three-month time limit.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed all complaints because they were out of time.
- The effective date of termination was 7 July 2021, meaning the ordinary time limit for unfair dismissal expired on 6 October 2021.
- The claim was presented on 6 July 2022 – over nine months late.
- The claimant argued it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, but the tribunal rejected this, noting that his brother had previous tribunal experience and was aware of time limits.
- The tribunal also considered whether it would be just and equitable to extend time but declined, as the delay was excessive and unexplained.
- No compensation was awarded as the claim was dismissed in its entirety.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employment tribunal claims must usually be brought within three months of the effective date of termination – missing this deadline can be fatal to your case.
- If you are assisted by someone with tribunal experience, the tribunal will expect them to know about time limits and will not easily accept ignorance as an excuse.
- Even if you feel pressured to resign, you must act quickly if you want to challenge it – delay can lose you the right to bring a claim.
- Sending a claim to the wrong office or with insufficient postage will not excuse a late filing if the overall delay is substantial.
A long career ended under pressure
After more than 40 years as a street cleaner, the claimant was told by his manager to write a resignation letter on his 66th birthday. He felt he had no choice but to comply. He later argued that this was a constructive dismissal – that his employer had forced him out without proper process. But by the time he brought his claim to the employment tribunal, almost a year had passed.
Why the tribunal could not hear the case
The law requires most employment claims to be brought within three months of the dismissal. For the claimant, that deadline was 6 October 2021. He did not present his claim until 6 July 2022 – over nine months late. His brother, who helped him with the paperwork, had previous experience with tribunals and knew about time limits. The tribunal found that there was no good reason for the delay. Even sending the claim to the wrong office with insufficient postage did not explain why it took so long to act.
What this means for similar cases
This case is a stark reminder that time limits in employment tribunals are strictly enforced. Even if you have a strong case of constructive dismissal or age discrimination, you must act quickly. The tribunal will not extend the deadline simply because you feel you were treated unfairly. If you are considering a claim, seek advice early – ideally before the three-month window closes.
The claimant's long service and the circumstances of his departure may have given him a strong case on the merits. But because he missed the deadline, the tribunal never considered those issues. The case was dismissed without any hearing on the facts.
Similar cases
Unfair dismissal claim rejected as out of time despite ongoing grievance appeal
A surveyor on a zero-hours contract lost his unfair dismissal claim after presenting it four months late, but his age discrimination claim was allowed to proceed.
Associate Headteacher with 20 years' service resigned before redundancy: claims dismissed
An associate headteacher who resigned after being told her role would be made redundant lost her claims for unfair dismissal and age discrimination. The tribunal found she was not dismissed but resigned voluntarily.
Payments consultant allowed to add minimum wage and wrongful dismissal claims
A tribunal has granted a payments consultant permission to amend his claim to include wrongful dismissal and National Minimum Wage complaints, but refused to add automatic unfair dismissal. The case highlights the hurdles of bringing claims when working through a limited company.
Staff nurse's constructive dismissal claim over whistleblowing fails
A tribunal has dismissed all claims brought by a Band 5 staff nurse against Lewisham and Greenwich NHS Trust, including constructive dismissal, whistleblowing detriment, and discrimination on grounds of race, age, and religion.