Partial win £5,383 awarded Employment Tribunal · 27 January 2023

Social worker with dyspraxia placed on performance plan: disability discrimination partly upheld

A children's services social worker with dyspraxia was discriminated against when her employer placed her on performance improvement plans. The tribunal awarded £5,382.90 but rejected her constructive dismissal claim.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was employed as a social worker by the London Borough of Enfield from 3 November 2017.
  • She had dyspraxia, which was accepted as a disability under the Equality Act 2010.
  • The respondent provided most recommended auxiliary aids by October 2020, but the claimant had not completed training on the software.
  • The claimant was placed on an informal performance improvement plan in June 2020 and a formal plan in November 2020.
  • The tribunal found that placing the claimant on performance improvement plans was unfavourable treatment because of something arising from her disability.
  • The claimant resigned on 12 November 2021, claiming constructive unfair dismissal, but the tribunal found no fundamental breach of contract.

Timeline

  1. Employment started

    Claimant began work as a full-time social worker for the London Borough of Enfield.

  2. Workplace assessment report

    DWP Workplace Assessment recommended various auxiliary aids including Dragon software, Dictaphone, and coaching.

  3. Mr Wright became team leader

    Mr Paul Wright started as the claimant's team leader.

  4. National lockdown

    UK lockdown due to COVID-19; claimant worked from home.

  5. Informal performance improvement plan

    Claimant was placed on an informal PIP due to performance concerns.

  6. All auxiliary aids provided

    All recommended auxiliary aids (except printer) were available to the claimant, though training was incomplete.

  7. Collective process introduced

    Mr Wright introduced a new way of working for the team.

  8. Formal performance improvement plan

    Claimant was placed on a formal PIP and raised a grievance.

  9. Claimant went off sick

    Claimant was signed off sick due to stress and did not return to work.

  10. Resignation

    Claimant resigned with two months' notice, effective 11 January 2022.

  11. Judgment issued

    Tribunal found disability discrimination (s.15) succeeded in part; constructive unfair dismissal dismissed.

The outcome

The tribunal upheld the claimant's claim under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010, finding that placing her on performance improvement plans was unfavourable treatment because of something arising from her disability (dyspraxia). However, her claims for failure to make reasonable adjustments and constructive unfair dismissal were dismissed.

  • Compensation: £5,382.90 (no breakdown provided)
  • Key reasons: The employer provided most recommended auxiliary aids by October 2020, but the claimant had not completed training. The performance plans were linked to her disability-related difficulties, but the employer did not fundamentally breach the contract of employment.

Lessons & takeaways

  • Employers should ensure that employees with disabilities receive full training on any auxiliary aids provided, not just the equipment itself.
  • Performance improvement plans can amount to unfavourable treatment if they are linked to disability-related performance issues.
  • A constructive dismissal claim requires a fundamental breach of contract; simply being unhappy with management decisions is not enough.
  • Disability discrimination claims can succeed even if the employer has made some adjustments, if the overall treatment is unfavourable because of the disability.
  • Employees should consider raising grievances and giving employers a chance to remedy issues before resigning and claiming constructive dismissal.

What this case shows in practice

This case highlights the fine line between managing performance and discriminating against a disabled employee. The social worker, who had dyspraxia, was placed on informal and then formal performance improvement plans after her team leader introduced a new way of working. While the employer had provided most of the recommended auxiliary aids, the tribunal found that the performance plans themselves were unfavourable treatment because of something arising from her disability. The key issue was that the employer did not fully consider how the claimant's dyspraxia affected her performance before imposing the plans.

What the employer could have done differently

The London Borough of Enfield could have avoided liability by ensuring that the claimant completed training on the software provided as an auxiliary aid, and by exploring alternative ways to address performance concerns that took her disability into account. The tribunal noted that the employer had not completed the training process, which left the claimant without the full benefit of the adjustments. A more proactive approach to supporting the claimant's return to work after sick leave might also have prevented the situation escalating.

Why the result matters

This decision confirms that performance improvement plans can be a form of disability discrimination if they are imposed without proper consideration of the employee's disability-related needs. However, it also shows that constructive dismissal claims are difficult to win: the tribunal found no fundamental breach of contract, even though the employer had discriminated. For employees, this means that resigning and claiming constructive dismissal is a high-risk strategy; it is often better to raise grievances and seek reasonable adjustments first. For employers, the message is clear: performance management processes must be adapted for disabled employees, and simply providing equipment is not enough — training and support are essential.

Similar cases

Claim dismissed · Jul 2025

Race discrimination claim dismissed after social worker missed time limit

An experienced social worker's race discrimination and constructive dismissal claims against Devon County Council were dismissed because she presented her claim too late, and the tribunal refused to extend time.

race-discriminationtime-limitsconstructive-dismissal
Respondent won · Nov 2023

Constructive dismissal claim fails after employee stayed on for months

A solutions engineer who resigned after a performance improvement plan and grievance process lost his constructive dismissal claim because he stayed in the job too long after the alleged breaches.

constructive-dismissalperformance-improvement-plangrievance-process
Respondent won · Nov 2023

Shift team leader loses constructive dismissal claim after credibility issues

A shift team leader with 9 years' service resigned after being placed on a performance improvement plan, but the tribunal dismissed all claims, finding no breach of contract and serious credibility problems with his evidence.

constructive-dismissaldisability-discriminationreasonable-adjustments
Partial win · Oct 2023

GP forced to resign after employer failed to provide ergonomic aids and held surprise performance meeting

A tribunal found that a GP with bipolar disorder and severe neck pain was constructively dismissed and discriminated against after her employer failed to provide a suitable chair and mouse, and treated her negatively in a performance meeting.

disability-discriminationbipolar-disorderneck-pain