Sleep-in payments and holiday pay: former employee wins £1,704 in unauthorised deductions claim
A former employee of Teen Support Services Ltd has won a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages, receiving £1,704.12 for unpaid sleep-in payments and annual leave. Her unfair dismissal claim was rejected.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #sleep-in-payments
- #annual-leave-pay
- #holiday-pay-calculation
- #two-year-limit
Key facts
- The claimant worked for the respondent from March 2020 to 18 October 2021.
- The claimant presented her complaint on 20 March 2022.
- The respondent failed to pay sleep-in payments for annual leave from 20 March 2020 to 18 October 2021.
- The respondent failed to pay accrued annual leave from 20 March 2020 to 18 October 2021.
- The claimant's unfair dismissal claim failed.
Timeline
-
Start of relevant period
The period from which unauthorised deductions could be considered begins.
-
Claimant stopped working
The claimant ceased working for the respondent.
-
Claim presented
The claimant presented her complaint to the tribunal.
-
Hearing
The substantive hearing took place at East London Hearing Centre.
-
Judgment issued
The judgment was issued with reasons.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employer unlawfully deducted wages by not paying sleep-in payments during annual leave and by failing to pay accrued holiday pay when the claimant left. It also considered whether the dismissal was unfair.
The outcome
The tribunal upheld the claim for unauthorised deductions but dismissed the unfair dismissal claim.
- Sleep-in payments: £937.50 for 20 nights at £37.50 per night during the relevant period (20 March 2020 to 18 October 2021).
- Annual leave pay: £766.62 for 2 weeks' accrued holiday (based on average weekly pay of £383.31).
- Total award: £1,704.12.
Lessons & takeaways
- If your employer fails to pay sleep-in payments or holiday pay, you may have a claim for unauthorised deductions from wages.
- Claims for unauthorised deductions must be brought within three months of the last deduction, but the tribunal can only go back two years from the claim date.
- Holiday pay should include regular overtime or allowances like sleep-in payments if they are part of normal remuneration.
- Unfair dismissal claims require two years' service and a fair reason; a conduct dismissal may be fair if the employer follows a reasonable process.
A case about sleep-in payments and holiday pay
This case shows how employers can get into trouble by not properly calculating holiday pay. The former employee worked for Teen Support Services Ltd from March 2020 to October 2021. She was entitled to sleep-in payments of £37.50 per night, but the employer did not include these in her annual leave pay. When she left, she was also not paid for accrued holiday.
What the tribunal decided
The tribunal found that the employer had made unauthorised deductions from wages. The law requires that holiday pay reflect normal remuneration, which includes regular payments like sleep-in allowances. The employer failed to do this, and also failed to pay the claimant for two weeks of accrued holiday she had not taken.
However, the unfair dismissal claim failed. The claimant did not have two years' continuous service (she worked from March 2020 to October 2021, just over 18 months), so she could not bring a claim for unfair dismissal. The tribunal also noted that the dismissal was for conduct and the employer had followed a reasonable process.
What the employer could have done differently
The employer could have avoided this claim by ensuring that holiday pay included sleep-in payments from the start. They should also have paid accrued holiday on termination. A proper payroll system that accounts for all elements of pay would have prevented this.
Why this matters
This case is a reminder that holiday pay must include regular allowances. Employees who do not receive proper holiday pay can bring claims for unauthorised deductions. It also highlights the importance of the two-year service requirement for unfair dismissal claims – without it, employees cannot challenge the fairness of their dismissal.
Similar cases
36 years at BT, then resignation: constructive dismissal claim fails over new ticketing system
A team member with 36 years' service resigned after performance concerns were raised following a new ticketing system. The tribunal dismissed her constructive dismissal claim but awarded £306.40 for unpaid holiday pay.
Sales executive who resigned over pay plan changes loses constructive dismissal claim
A sales executive with four years' service who resigned after a new commission structure was introduced has lost his constructive unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal found no fundamental breach of contract.
Zero-hours employee failed to prove dismissal: tribunal rejects holiday pay and unfair dismissal claims
A zero-hours employee who claimed unfair dismissal and unpaid holiday pay had her case dismissed after the tribunal found she had not been dismissed and remained employed. Two late reconsideration applications were also refused.
Apprentice barber dismissed for soliciting clients: whistleblowing claim fails
An apprentice barber who was summarily dismissed for soliciting clients and setting up a rival business failed to prove his dismissal was due to whistleblowing. The tribunal awarded £1,431 for unauthorised wage deductions.
