Senior consultant cardiac surgeon's unfair dismissal claim thrown out for being five months late
A consultant cardiac surgeon who presented his unfair dismissal claim five months after the deadline was refused an extension. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for him to have claimed in time, despite his health issues and lack of awareness of the time limit.
1 min read · Last updated 19 May 2026
Case details
- #out-of-time
- #reasonably-practicable
- #legal-representation
- #ignorance-of-time-limits
- #health-issues
Key facts
- The claimant was dismissed on 20 October 2022.
- The primary time limit for an unfair dismissal claim expired on 19 January 2023.
- The claimant presented his claim on 19 June 2023, about five months late.
- The claimant was legally represented at the time of dismissal and sought advice about unfair dismissal.
- The claimant was unaware of the time limit until 10 June 2023.
- The claimant had health issues including PTSD and work-related stress.
Timeline
-
Incident leading to dismissal
A chest drain insertion in a patient led to massive bleeding and the patient's death. The claimant was the senior doctor present.
-
Suspension
The claimant was suspended and investigated.
-
Return to work
The claimant returned to work.
-
Sickness absence
The claimant began a period of sickness absence.
-
Dismissal
The claimant was dismissed following a disciplinary hearing. The effective date of termination is 20 October 2022.
-
Time limit expiry
The primary time limit for unfair dismissal and discrimination complaints about the dismissal ended.
-
First awareness of time limits
The claimant spoke with an employment adviser and first became aware of time limits for tribunal claims.
-
ACAS early conciliation
The claimant contacted ACAS; certificate issued on 13 June 2023.
-
Claim presented
The claimant presented his claim to the tribunal.
-
Application to amend
The claimant applied to amend his claim to add race discrimination complaints.
-
Preliminary hearing
The tribunal heard the time limit issue and amendment application.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether it could hear an unfair dismissal claim that was presented about five months late, on the grounds that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present it in time. It also considered whether to allow the claimant to amend his claim to add race discrimination complaints.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim as it was presented out of time. The claimant was dismissed on 20 October 2022, meaning the primary time limit expired on 19 January 2023. He presented his claim on 19 June 2023, about five months late. The tribunal found that the claimant had legal representation at the time of dismissal and had sought advice about unfair dismissal, so it was reasonably practicable for him to have known about the time limit. His health issues, including PTSD and work-related stress, did not prevent him from presenting the claim in time. The application to amend to add race discrimination complaints was also refused, as those complaints were also out of time and there was no reasonable explanation for the delay.
Lessons & takeaways
- The three-month time limit for unfair dismissal claims is strict and runs from the effective date of termination, not from when you learn about the time limit.
- Having legal representation at the time of dismissal can count against you if you later claim ignorance of time limits.
- Health issues alone may not excuse a late claim if you were capable of seeking advice or presenting a claim within the time limit.
- If you want to add new complaints to an existing claim, they must also be within the time limit or you must show a good reason for the delay.
A costly delay
This case shows how unforgiving employment tribunal time limits can be, even for senior professionals facing serious personal difficulties. The claimant, a consultant cardiac surgeon, was dismissed following a tragic incident where a patient died after a chest drain procedure. He suffered from PTSD and work-related stress, and was unaware of the three-month time limit for unfair dismissal claims until he spoke to an employment adviser in June 2023 – nearly five months after the deadline had passed.
What the tribunal said
The tribunal acknowledged the claimant's health issues but found that he had been legally represented at the time of his dismissal and had sought advice about unfair dismissal. This meant it was reasonably practicable for him to have learned about the time limit and presented his claim in time. The judge noted that ignorance of the law is not a valid excuse, especially when legal advice was available. The claim was therefore dismissed as out of time, and an application to add race discrimination complaints was also refused as those were also late and no reasonable explanation was given.
What could have been done differently
The claimant's solicitor could have flagged the time limit immediately after dismissal. Even if the claimant was unwell, a protective claim could have been lodged within the time limit to preserve his rights, with further details added later. The case is a reminder that early legal advice is crucial – and that simply being unaware of a deadline, even with health problems, is rarely enough to persuade a tribunal to extend time.
Similar cases
Unfair dismissal claim thrown out for being two months late
A former security guard's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed after he presented it two months after the deadline. The tribunal ruled it was reasonably practicable for him to have filed on time despite his mental health issues and lack of legal knowledge.
Parts Sales Manager's unfair dismissal claim dismissed as out of time despite Covid home-schooling
A tribunal dismissed an unfair dismissal claim from a Parts Sales Manager with 14 years' service because he presented it over four months late, ruling it was reasonably practicable for him to have done so in time.
Dismissed while off sick: unfair dismissal claim thrown out as too late
A former night watchman who waited 10 months to bring an unfair dismissal claim after being sacked while on sick leave has had his case dismissed as out of time. The tribunal refused to extend the deadline, ruling it was reasonably practicable for him to have claimed sooner.
Car mechanic dismissed over missing tool: tribunal throws out claim as too late
A car mechanic who was summarily dismissed after a missing tool was found in his toolbox had his unfair dismissal claim rejected because he presented it 17 days after the legal deadline.
