Prison officer dismissed for fraudulent expense claims: dismissal upheld
A prison officer who systematically inflated mileage claims and claimed travel time as expenses to avoid tax was fairly dismissed for gross misconduct. The tribunal also ordered him to repay £863.25.
2 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #prison-officer
- #expense-fraud
- #bed-watch-duties
- #race-discrimination
- #summary-dismissal
- #counterclaim
Key facts
- The claimant was a prison officer at HMP Wormwood Scrubs from 8 June 2018 until dismissal on 30 April 2021.
- He claimed travel time as an expense rather than overtime to avoid tax, which the tribunal found dishonest.
- He systematically inflated mileage claims by about 20% and invented journeys, including a claim for a journey that could not have occurred.
- He claimed Dartford crossing tolls at £2.50 per journey when he paid £2, and claimed for 80 journeys but only 54 were verified.
- The investigation began after another officer's large claim was flagged; five Nigerian officers were investigated, but the tribunal found no race discrimination.
- The employer's counterclaim for overpaid mileage and tolls succeeded in the sum of £863.25.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Claimant began working as a prison officer at HMP Wormwood Scrubs.
-
Expense claims period begins
Claimant began claiming travel time as expenses and inflating mileage claims.
-
Investigation triggered
Another officer's large mileage claim flagged; investigation expanded to include claimant.
-
Investigation commenced
Ms Speedie began investigating claimant's expenses.
-
Claimant interviewed
Claimant interviewed by telephone with union representative.
-
Investigation concluded
Investigation report submitted on 18 March 2021.
-
Disciplinary hearing notified
Governor French informed claimant of disciplinary hearing for gross misconduct.
-
Disciplinary hearing (day 1)
First day of disciplinary hearing.
-
Disciplinary hearing (day 2) and dismissal
Second day; claimant dismissed for gross misconduct.
-
Dismissal confirmed
Letter confirming dismissal sent to claimant.
-
Appeal lodged
Claimant appealed dismissal on four grounds.
-
Appeal hearing in claimant's absence
Governor Bickers proceeded with appeal hearing after claimant failed to attend multiple times.
-
Appeal dismissed
Claimant informed appeal failed.
-
Claim presented
Claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal, and race discrimination.
-
Tribunal hearing commenced
Substantive hearing at London Central Employment Tribunal.
-
Judgment issued
All claims dismissed; employer's counterclaim for £863.25 succeeded.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the prison officer was unfairly dismissed, wrongfully dismissed, or subjected to direct race discrimination when he was dismissed for fraudulent expense claims, and whether the employer was entitled to recover overpaid expenses.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed all of the claimant's claims and upheld the employer's counterclaim.
- The dismissal was fair because the employer genuinely believed the claimant had committed gross misconduct by making dishonest expense claims, and the investigation and disciplinary process were reasonable.
- The race discrimination claim failed because the claimant did not prove that other officers of different races were treated more favourably; the fact that five Nigerian officers were investigated did not show discrimination.
- The wrongful dismissal claim failed because the claimant's dishonesty amounted to gross misconduct, justifying summary dismissal without notice.
- The employer's counterclaim succeeded: the claimant was ordered to repay £863.25 in overpaid mileage and tolls.
Lessons & takeaways
- Claiming travel time as expenses rather than overtime to avoid tax is likely to be treated as dishonesty and can justify summary dismissal.
- Inflating mileage claims, even by small amounts, can amount to gross misconduct if it is systematic and deliberate.
- Being one of several employees investigated from the same ethnic group does not, by itself, prove race discrimination — you need evidence of less favourable treatment compared to a real comparator.
- Employers can recover overpaid expenses through a counterclaim in the employment tribunal if the employee acted dishonestly.
- Representing yourself at tribunal is risky — the claimant struggled to provide clear evidence and his case was dismissed on all grounds.
A case of systematic dishonesty
This case shows how a prison officer lost his job and ended up owing money after making dishonest expense claims over several months. The claimant, who had worked at HMP Wormwood Scrubs for nearly three years, began claiming travel time as expenses rather than overtime to avoid paying tax. He also systematically inflated his mileage claims by about 20% and invented journeys, including one that could not have occurred. The tribunal found that he knew what he was doing was wrong — he had signed a declaration each time he submitted an expenses form confirming compliance with the policy.
What the employer did right
The Ministry of Justice carried out a thorough investigation after another officer's large claim was flagged. The investigation was conducted by a dedicated officer, the claimant was interviewed with a union representative present, and the disciplinary hearing was chaired by a senior manager who considered all the evidence. The tribunal noted that the employer had a genuine belief in the claimant's dishonesty based on reasonable grounds, and dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses for a conduct dismissal. The appeal process was also fair, even though the claimant failed to attend the appeal hearing.
Why the race discrimination claim failed
The claimant argued that he was discriminated against because he was a black Nigerian officer and five Nigerian officers were investigated. However, the tribunal found no evidence that officers of other races were treated differently. The investigation was triggered by a large claim from another officer, not by the claimant's ethnicity. The tribunal also noted that the claimant did not provide a comparator of a different race who was treated more favourably in similar circumstances.
The counterclaim for overpaid expenses
In addition to dismissing all of the claimant's claims, the tribunal ordered him to repay £863.25 in overpaid mileage and tolls. This was based on the employer's detailed breakdown of the fraudulent claims. The case serves as a reminder that employers can recover money paid as a result of employee dishonesty through a counterclaim in the employment tribunal.
Similar cases
Branch manager loses constructive dismissal and race discrimination claim after failing to attend hearing
A branch manager who resigned claiming constructive dismissal and race discrimination has had all his claims dismissed by an employment tribunal, which also ordered him to repay £17,727.86 in overpaid commission.
Commercial Director dismissed after TUPE transfer: race discrimination claim fails
A black African Commercial Director dismissed without notice or consultation after a TUPE transfer lost his race discrimination claim. The tribunal found no evidence that race played any part in the decision.
Prison officer's constructive dismissal claim over locker incident rejected
A prison officer who resigned after a locker break-in and a refused job endorsement failed to prove constructive dismissal or discrimination. The tribunal found no protected disclosure and no dismissal.
Wrong ACAS advice leads to claim being struck out as out of time
An engineer with 5 years' service had his unfair dismissal and race discrimination claims struck out after relying on incorrect ACAS advice that caused an 8-month delay in presenting his claim.