Dismissed during probation after disclosing pregnancy: automatic unfair dismissal
A client relationship manager was automatically unfairly dismissed after telling her employer she was pregnant, just weeks into her probation. The tribunal awarded over £28,500 for pregnancy and race discrimination.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as a client relationship manager from 22 March 2021 to 18 June 2021.
- On 8 April 2021, the second respondent made a racially offensive comment to the claimant.
- The claimant disclosed her pregnancy to the second respondent on 3 June 2021.
- The claimant was dismissed on 18 June 2021, during her probationary period, shortly after disclosing her pregnancy.
- The first respondent went into administration on 4 November 2021.
- The tribunal found the dismissal was automatically unfair due to pregnancy and that the claimant suffered pregnancy discrimination and race discrimination/harassment.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Claimant began employment as a client relationship manager with a three-month probationary period.
-
Racial comment
Second respondent told claimant she was 'like a talented footballer whose head is not in the game' and referenced African kids.
-
Positive mid-year review
Claimant's former line manager completed a mid-year report recommending continued employment.
-
Pregnancy disclosed
Claimant informed second respondent she was pregnant; he asked about her probation review.
-
Probation review changed
Claimant was told her probation review would require board approval, unlike other employees.
-
Performance questioned
Second respondent questioned claimant's work in a senior staff meeting.
-
Dismissal
Claimant was dismissed for unsatisfactory probation outcome; reasons given were 'not being a good fit'.
-
Grievance submitted
Claimant submitted a grievance, which was not upheld; appeal also rejected.
-
Discriminatory letter
First respondent's solicitor sent a letter asking why claimant did not announce pregnancy at interview.
-
Administration
First respondent went into administration.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the claimant was automatically unfairly dismissed because of pregnancy, whether she was directly discriminated against and harassed on grounds of race, and whether she suffered pregnancy discrimination.
The outcome
The tribunal upheld the claims of automatic unfair dismissal, pregnancy discrimination, and race discrimination/harassment. The victimisation claim was dismissed.
Compensation:
- £6,506.49 for unfair dismissal (compensatory award)
- £4,000 for injury to feelings for race discrimination/harassment (including £2,000 aggravated damages) plus £518.40 interest
- £16,000 for injury to feelings for pregnancy discrimination plus £1,883.52 interest
- Total: £28,508.41
Lessons & takeaways
- Pregnancy-related dismissal is automatically unfair regardless of length of service – even during a probation period.
- Racially offensive comments can amount to harassment and discrimination, especially when combined with pregnancy discrimination.
- Employers should not treat a pregnancy disclosure as a reason to accelerate performance reviews or change procedures.
- Sending a letter asking why the claimant didn't announce pregnancy at interview can be post-employment discrimination.
- Claimants can bring claims for both pregnancy and race discrimination arising from the same set of facts.
This case shows how quickly an employer's reaction to a pregnancy disclosure can lead to automatic unfair dismissal, even when the employee is still in their probation period. The claimant, a client relationship manager, was dismissed just 15 days after telling her manager she was pregnant. The tribunal found that the real reason for dismissal was the pregnancy itself, not the probation review.
What the employer did wrong
The employer's actions went beyond a simple procedural failure. After the pregnancy disclosure, the claimant was told her probation review would need board approval – a departure from the normal process. Her performance was questioned in a meeting, and she was dismissed for 'not being a good fit'. The tribunal also found that a racially offensive comment made weeks earlier, comparing the claimant to a footballer and referencing African children, amounted to harassment. A later letter from the respondent's solicitor, asking why the claimant hadn't announced her pregnancy at interview, was treated as post-employment discrimination.
Why the result matters
This case is a reminder that pregnancy discrimination claims do not require two years' service. The automatic unfair dismissal protection applies from day one. The substantial injury to feelings awards – £16,000 for pregnancy discrimination and £4,000 for race harassment, with £2,000 aggravated – reflect the seriousness of the conduct. The tribunal also highlighted that the employer's actions were aggravated by the second respondent's behaviour. For employees in similar situations, the key takeaway is that the timing of a dismissal relative to a pregnancy disclosure is often decisive evidence.
Similar cases
Dismissed for a cigarette break while pregnant: a taxi operator's unfair dismissal win
A telephone operator who was dismissed for taking a cigarette break 12 minutes into her shift, while other employees who did the same were not disciplined, has won her claim for automatic unfair dismissal related to pregnancy. The tribunal awarded her £17,003.
Pregnant hairdresser dismissed after self-isolating: automatic unfair dismissal
A hairdresser who was dismissed after self-isolating following contact with a COVID-positive client has won her claim for automatic unfair dismissal and pregnancy discrimination. The Bristol tribunal awarded £59,632.94.
Sonographer forced to clean and threatened with deportation: race discrimination upheld
A black African sonographer was racially harassed and discriminated against after being required to perform cleaning duties and threatened with deportation. The tribunal awarded £33,611.12.
Social worker's race discrimination claim over 'aggressive' stereotype dismissed
A black social worker with 15 years' service lost her claims of race discrimination and constructive dismissal after an altercation with a white colleague. The tribunal found no evidence of stereotyping or unfair treatment.
