Healthcare assistant dismissed for slapping colleague: conduct dismissal upheld
An employment tribunal has upheld the dismissal of a healthcare assistant with six years' service who slapped a colleague on the cheek during handover, finding the NHS trust acted reasonably.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #physical-contact
- #workplace-slapping
- #trust-values
- #lack-of-insight
- #previous-incident
Key facts
- The claimant slapped a female nursing assistant on the cheek to get her attention during handover.
- The claimant had previously slapped the same colleague in a canteen and been told to stop.
- The claimant admitted the contact but described it as a light tap and maintained it was a joke.
- The dismissing officer found the claimant lacked insight and dismissed for gross misconduct.
- The appeal upheld the dismissal.
Timeline
-
Previous incident
The claimant slapped NAX on the head/face in the canteen; NAX told him to stop.
-
Patient complaint
A patient reported seeing a male nursing assistant slap a female nursing assistant on the face.
-
Claimant's account and suspension
The claimant gave his account, demonstrated the contact, and was suspended.
-
Investigation meeting with claimant
The claimant repeated his account of a playful tap.
-
Investigation meeting with NAX
NAX described the slap as unwanted and upsetting.
-
Investigation report
The investigation recommended proceeding to a disciplinary hearing.
-
Disciplinary hearing
The claimant demonstrated the contact on his companion; the dismissing officer decided to dismiss.
-
Dismissal confirmed
The claimant was summarily dismissed for gross misconduct.
-
Appeal hearing
The appeal was heard and dismissed.
-
Appeal outcome
The appeal was rejected.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether Guy's and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust acted reasonably in dismissing the claimant for misconduct (slapping a colleague's face) and whether the claimant was guilty of gross misconduct entitling the trust to dismiss without notice.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed the claimant's unfair dismissal claim, finding that the trust acted reasonably. The key reasons were:
- The trust had a genuine belief, based on reasonable grounds, that the claimant had slapped a colleague.
- The investigation was reasonable, and the disciplinary process was fair.
- Dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses, given the previous similar incident and the claimant's failure to recognise the seriousness of his actions.
- The claimant was guilty of gross misconduct, so the wrongful dismissal claim also failed.
No compensation was awarded as the claim was unsuccessful.
Lessons & takeaways
- Physical contact with colleagues, even if intended as a joke, can amount to gross misconduct if it is unwanted and especially if there is a history of similar behaviour.
- Employers should consider previous warnings or incidents when deciding whether dismissal is a reasonable response to misconduct.
- A lack of insight or remorse can weigh heavily against an employee in a disciplinary process, as it suggests the behaviour may be repeated.
- Trust values and policies on dignity and respect are relevant factors in assessing the seriousness of misconduct in healthcare settings.
What this case shows in practice
This case highlights how a single act of physical contact, even when described by the employee as a 'light tap' or a joke, can lead to dismissal if it is unwanted and violates workplace policies. The claimant, a healthcare assistant with six years of service, slapped a female nursing assistant on the cheek during a handover to get her attention. The slap was witnessed by a patient, who reported it. Crucially, the claimant had slapped the same colleague in a canteen two days earlier and been told to stop. The trust's values, which emphasise dignity and respect, were central to the decision to dismiss.
What the trust did right
The trust followed a thorough process: it investigated promptly, obtained witness accounts, gave the claimant opportunities to explain, and held a disciplinary hearing. The dismissing officer considered the previous incident and the claimant's lack of insight—he maintained it was a joke and did not appreciate the impact on the colleague. The appeal was also properly considered. The tribunal found that the trust's belief in the misconduct was reasonable and that dismissal was within the range of reasonable responses.
Why the result matters
For employees, this case is a reminder that physical contact in the workplace, even if intended as harmless banter, can have serious consequences if it is unwelcome. For employers, it shows that a fair process combined with a clear policy on conduct can justify dismissal even for a single incident, particularly where there is a prior warning and the employee shows no remorse. The tribunal's decision underscores that in healthcare settings, where trust and dignity are paramount, such behaviour is unlikely to be tolerated.
Similar cases
Specialty doctor dismissed for capability after years of performance issues: NHS trust's decision upheld
An employment tribunal has upheld the dismissal of a specialty doctor with 12 years' service for capability, finding the NHS trust's process was fair and that his disability was not the cause of his performance problems.
Dismissed for sending sexual messages to colleagues: gross misconduct upheld
An employment tribunal has held that the Home Office fairly dismissed a PO3 examiner who sent unsolicited sexual messages to female colleagues and made inappropriate comments about a colleague's teenage daughter.
