Partial win Employment Tribunal · 14 October 2022

Former employee ordered to pay £196 after counterclaim succeeds

A former employee who claimed unfair dismissal and unpaid wages was ordered to pay £196 after the employer's counterclaim for breach of contract succeeded.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • Claimant employed from 15 April 2021 to 29 October 2021.
  • Claimant did not attend the hearing.
  • Claimant lacked 2 years' service for unfair dismissal claim.
  • Respondent admitted owing £2,249.92 for wages, notice pay, holiday pay, and expenses.
  • Respondent's counterclaim for breach of contract succeeded in part, totalling £2,446.07.
  • Net judgment of £196.15 payable by claimant to respondent.

Timeline

  1. Employment started

    Claimant began employment with The Black Dog Saloon Limited.

  2. Employment ended

    Claimant's employment terminated.

  3. Respondent's statement

    Respondent submitted a statement detailing its counterclaim for £4,202.21.

  4. Hearing

    Employment Tribunal hearing by CVP. Claimant did not attend. Judgment issued.

The outcome

The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the employee had only six months' service, falling short of the two-year qualifying period.

The employee's claim for unpaid wages and expenses succeeded to the extent of £2,249.92, which the employer admitted was owed.

However, the employer's counterclaim for breach of contract succeeded in part, totalling £2,446.07, covering damage to equipment and other losses.

After balancing the two, the net judgment was £196.15 payable by the employee to the employer.

Lessons & takeaways

  • Employees must have at least two years' continuous service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim.
  • Employers can bring counterclaims for breach of contract if the employee brings a contract claim, even if the employee does not attend the hearing.
  • Documenting property and equipment condition can help employers prove losses in a counterclaim.
  • Not attending a tribunal hearing can result in the case proceeding without you and a judgment being made on the available evidence.

A case of competing claims

This case shows what can happen when an employment relationship ends badly and both sides have grievances. The former employee claimed unfair dismissal and unpaid wages, but the employer responded with a counterclaim for breach of contract, alleging the employee had caused damage to property and equipment.

The service qualification hurdle

The employee's unfair dismissal claim was doomed from the start because they had only worked for The Black Dog Saloon Limited for about six months. Under UK law, employees generally need two years' continuous service to bring an ordinary unfair dismissal claim. This is a strict legal requirement that the tribunal cannot waive.

The counterclaim succeeded

The employee did not attend the hearing, but the tribunal proceeded in their absence. The employer's director gave evidence that was accepted as reliable. The tribunal found the employee had breached their duty to take reasonable care of the employer's property, awarding £2,446.07 for various items including a damaged laptop, drinks equipment, and replacement locks. This was more than the £2,249.92 the employer admitted owing for wages, notice pay, holiday pay and expenses.

What this means for similar cases

The result is a net judgment of £196.15 payable by the employee to the employer. This case highlights the importance of attending tribunal hearings and the risk that an employer's counterclaim can wipe out or exceed any sums owed to the employee. It also shows that employers can recover losses if they can prove the employee caused damage or failed to take reasonable care of property.

Similar cases

Partial win £1,500 · Dec 2023

Tutor unfairly dismissed after employer mistakenly accepted resignation

A tutor with three years' service was unfairly dismissed when her employer wrongly believed she had resigned. The tribunal awarded £1,499.54 for breach of contract and unlawful deduction of wages.

unfair-dismissalbreach-of-contractunlawful-deduction-from-wages
Respondent won · Oct 2023

Unfair dismissal claim struck out due to insufficient service: lessons on the two-year qualifying period

A former employee's unfair dismissal claim was struck out because they had worked for less than two years. Their breach of contract claim also failed, but they were entitled to £90.28 holiday pay.

strike-outinsufficient-serviceholiday-pay
Respondent won · Jun 2023

Branch manager loses constructive dismissal and race discrimination claim after failing to attend hearing

A branch manager who resigned claiming constructive dismissal and race discrimination has had all his claims dismissed by an employment tribunal, which also ordered him to repay £17,727.86 in overpaid commission.

constructive-dismissalrace-discriminationbreach-of-contract
Partial win £1,819 · May 2023

Default judgment against Zobra Limited for unpaid wages, notice and holiday pay

A former employee won £1,819 after Zobra Limited failed to respond to claims of unauthorised wage deductions, breach of contract and unpaid holiday. Claims for unfair dismissal and redundancy were struck out due to insufficient service.

default-judgmentunauthorised-deductionsbreach-of-contract