Collection driver dismissed after hernia: employer's capability decision upheld
A collection and delivery driver with an umbilical hernia and muscle condition was fairly dismissed on capability grounds after his employer exhausted temporary adjustments. The tribunal found DPD Group UK Limited acted reasonably.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #umbilical-hernia
- #divarication-of-recti
- #occupational-health
- #reasonable-adjustments
- #capability-dismissal
- #res-judicata
- #stale-medical-report
Key facts
- The claimant was employed as a Collection and Delivery Driver from 9 January 2017 until his dismissal on 30 June 2020.
- The claimant had two medical conditions: an umbilical hernia and divarication of the recti.
- A previous employment tribunal had decided the claimant was not disabled under the Equality Act 2010.
- The claimant was dismissed on capability grounds after stating he could not perform his role.
- The respondent had made temporary adjustments including manual sorting of parcels, which were found to be unsustainable.
- The claimant's unfair dismissal claim was dismissed as the employer acted reasonably.
Timeline
-
Ultrasound scan
Ultrasound scan identified a tiny umbilical hernia and divarication of the rectus abdominus muscles.
-
Sickness absence begins
Claimant commenced sickness absence due to a fractured wrist.
-
First claim presented
Claimant presented his first employment tribunal claim for disability discrimination.
-
Final occupational health report
Occupational health physician Dr Brennan reported that the claimant's conditions did not appear to cause day-to-day impact.
-
Disability status hearing
Employment Judge Hutchinson decided the claimant was not disabled; the decision was later upheld on appeal.
-
Dismissal
Claimant was dismissed on capability grounds after stating he could not perform his role as a Collection and Delivery Driver.
-
Third claim presented
Claimant presented the third claim for unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.
-
Strike out decision
Employment Judge Camp struck out the disability discrimination claims as res judicata but refused to strike out the unfair dismissal claim.
-
Final hearing
Employment Judge Clark heard the unfair dismissal claim and dismissed it.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employer acted reasonably in dismissing the claimant on capability grounds due to long-term sickness, considering the medical evidence and adjustments made.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim. It found that DPD Group UK Limited had a genuine reason for dismissal (capability) and acted reasonably in the circumstances. The employer had made temporary adjustments, including manual sorting, but these were not sustainable long-term. The claimant's own statement that he could not perform his role was a key factor. No compensation was awarded.
Lessons & takeaways
- If you tell your employer you cannot do your job, they may treat that as a capability issue and dismiss fairly.
- Employers can rely on medical reports that are a few months old if they are still relevant and no updated evidence is provided.
- Temporary adjustments do not have to be continued indefinitely if they are not sustainable for the business.
- A previous tribunal decision that you are not disabled can prevent you from bringing new disability discrimination claims on the same condition.
What this case shows in practice
This case illustrates how an employer can fairly dismiss an employee on capability grounds when long-term sickness prevents them from doing their job, even if the employee has a medical condition. The claimant, a collection and delivery driver with three years' service, had an umbilical hernia and divarication of the recti. After a period of sickness absence, he told his employer he could not perform his driving role. DPD made temporary adjustments, such as manual sorting of parcels, but these were not sustainable. The tribunal accepted that the employer acted reasonably in dismissing him.
What the losing side could have done differently
The claimant represented himself and argued that his dismissal was unfair. However, the tribunal noted that he had not provided updated medical evidence to challenge the occupational health report, which was six months old at the time of dismissal. If he had obtained a recent report showing he could return to work with adjustments, the outcome might have been different. Additionally, the claimant had previously been found not disabled under the Equality Act, which limited his ability to bring discrimination claims.
Why the result matters for similar claims
This case reinforces that employers do not have to keep making temporary adjustments indefinitely. The key question is whether the employer acted reasonably in the circumstances. For employees with long-term health issues, it is crucial to engage with occupational health and provide up-to-date medical evidence. The tribunal also highlighted that a previous decision on disability status can bar future discrimination claims on the same condition, so employees should ensure they challenge such decisions early.
Similar cases
Forensic nurse dismissed for inability to kneel for CPR: employer acted reasonably
A tribunal has upheld the dismissal of a forensic custody nurse who could not kneel to perform CPR due to bilateral knee replacements. The employer was found to have acted within the range of reasonable responses.
26-year service, long-term sickness: capability dismissal upheld by tribunal
A Visual Merchandising Team Manager with 26 years' service was dismissed after over six months' absence. The tribunal rejected her claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.
Hair assessor dismissed after 22-month sickness absence: tribunal upholds capability decision
A tribunal has ruled that Skills to Group Limited fairly dismissed a hair assessor with 4 years' service who had been absent for 22 months due to complications from knee surgery. The employer's concerns about workplace safety justified the dismissal.
Security officer dismissed after back injury: tribunal finds unfair dismissal and disability discrimination
A security officer with six years' service was unfairly dismissed after a back injury. The tribunal also found that CIS Security Ltd failed to make reasonable adjustments and discriminated against him arising from his disability.
