Drayman dismissed after flagging vehicle overloading: automatic unfair dismissal
A beer delivery driver who repeatedly wrote 'overweight' on his delivery manifests was unfairly dismissed for raising health and safety concerns. The tribunal awarded £6,297 in compensation.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #health-and-safety
- #vehicle-overloading
- #drayman
- #automatic-unfair-dismissal
- #no-basic-award
Key facts
- Mr Tison was employed as a drayman from 1 March 2022 to 30 November 2022.
- He raised concerns about vehicle overloading in April/May 2022 and again in the final week of his employment.
- He wrote 'overweight' on delivery manifests on 22, 24, and 25 November 2022.
- He was dismissed without warning on 30 November 2022.
- The respondent did not attend the hearing or provide any evidence.
- The tribunal found the principal reason for dismissal was raising health and safety concerns.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Mr Tison began working as a drayman for Forest Road Brewing Co Ltd.
-
First raised concerns
Mr Tison initially raised concerns about vehicle overloading in April/May 2022.
-
Sick leave started
Mr Tison was signed off work due to an accident at work, with a fit note covering 19 October to 13 November 2022.
-
Returned to work
Mr Tison returned to work the week preceding his dismissal.
-
Wrote 'overweight' on manifest
Mr Tison wrote 'overweight' on the delivery manifest for 22 November 2022.
-
Wrote 'overweight again' on manifest
Mr Tison wrote 'overweight again' on the delivery manifest for 24 November 2022.
-
Circled weight and wrote 'false' on manifest
Mr Tison circled the apparent weight on the manifest and wrote 'false', explaining why it was incorrect.
-
Dismissed
Mr Tison was dismissed without warning, purportedly due to sickness absence.
-
Started first new job
Mr Tison started a new job paying £1400 net per month.
-
Started current job
Mr Tison started a new job paying £1835 net per month, nearly matching his previous pay.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the principal reason for the claimant's dismissal was his raising of health and safety concerns about vehicle overloading, which would make it an automatic unfair dismissal under section 100(c)(i) of the Employment Rights Act 1996.
The outcome
The tribunal ruled in favour of the claimant, finding that his dismissal was automatically unfair because the principal reason was his raising of health and safety concerns about vehicle overloading.
Key reasons:
- The claimant had raised concerns about vehicle overloading in April/May 2022 and again in the final week of his employment.
- He wrote 'overweight' on delivery manifests on 22, 24, and 25 November 2022.
- He was dismissed without warning on 30 November 2022, purportedly due to sickness absence.
- The respondent did not attend the hearing or provide any evidence.
Compensation breakdown:
- Compensatory award: £6,297 (representing lost earnings)
- Basic award: £0 (the claimant had less than two years' service, but this does not apply to automatic unfair dismissal for health and safety reasons; however, the tribunal did not award a basic award as it was not claimed or calculated)
Lessons & takeaways
- Employees with less than two years' service can still bring an automatic unfair dismissal claim if the reason is raising health and safety concerns.
- Writing concerns on delivery manifests or other work documents can be strong evidence that you raised the issue with management.
- Employers who fail to engage with tribunal proceedings risk having a default judgment made against them based on the claimant's evidence alone.
- Dismissing an employee shortly after they raise health and safety concerns can be a red flag for tribunals, especially without warning or investigation.
A driver who refused to stay silent about safety
A drayman (beer delivery driver) for Forest Road Brewing Co Ltd was dismissed without warning after repeatedly flagging that his van was overloaded. He had written 'overweight' on his delivery manifests on three consecutive days in November 2022, after earlier raising concerns months before. The tribunal found that the principal reason for his dismissal was these health and safety complaints, making it an automatic unfair dismissal.
The case highlights the protection that employees have when they raise genuine safety concerns. Even with only nine months' service, the claimant was able to bring a claim because the law treats health and safety dismissals as automatically unfair – meaning no minimum service period is required.
What the employer could have done differently
Forest Road Brewing Co Ltd did not attend the hearing or provide any evidence. The tribunal noted that the respondent had not engaged with the proceedings at all. Had they done so, they might have argued that the dismissal was for a different reason (such as sickness absence) or that they had investigated the concerns. But without any evidence from the employer, the tribunal accepted the claimant's account that the real reason was his safety complaints.
Why this matters for similar claims
This case is a reminder that employers must not penalise workers for raising health and safety concerns. The law provides strong protection, even for short-serving employees. For anyone in a similar position, documenting concerns in writing – as this claimant did on his manifests – can be crucial evidence. The tribunal awarded £6,297 in lost earnings, reflecting the period from dismissal to when the claimant found a new job at a similar salary.
Similar cases
Support worker dismissed for protecting himself from aggressive service user: automatic unfair dismissal
A support worker who used physical force to free himself from a service user who grabbed him was automatically unfairly dismissed. The tribunal found the principal reason was his health and safety actions, not misconduct.
Before and after school club leader loses Covid-19 safety dismissal claim
A before and after school club leader who refused to attend work during the pandemic claiming serious and imminent danger has lost her unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal found her belief was not reasonable given the school's risk assessments.
Gymnastics coach dismissed after asking for contract and payslips wins automatic unfair dismissal claim
A gymnastics coach was automatically unfairly dismissed after asserting her right to a written contract and payslips. The tribunal awarded £56,202 including compensation for unlawful wage deductions.
TUPE transfer and automatic unfair dismissal: employee wins after asserting statutory rights
A former employee of Plau Bistro Limited was automatically unfairly dismissed after asserting a statutory right following a TUPE transfer. The tribunal awarded £2,396.23 for unpaid wages, holiday pay, and notice pay.
