Claim dismissed Employment Tribunal · 27 July 2023

Dismissal date confusion: claim thrown out for being three months late

A crane operator who thought his unfair dismissal claim deadline ran from the appeal outcome lost his case when the tribunal ruled the clock started ticking from the original dismissal letter.

2 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was dismissed on 29 September 2022 due to ill-health capability.
  • The claimant believed the dismissal date was 8 November 2022, the date of the appeal outcome.
  • The claimant did not seek advice about time limits until after the appeal was concluded.
  • The claim was presented on 6 February 2023, more than three months after the actual dismissal.
  • The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time.

Timeline

  1. Accident at work

    Claimant suffered wrist pain while working as a crane operator and warehouse assistant.

  2. Surgery on wrist

    Claimant underwent surgery and was signed off work.

  3. Invitation to dismissal meeting

    Respondent invited claimant to a meeting to consider dismissal on ill-health capability grounds.

  4. Dismissal meeting

    Claimant was told he would be dismissed due to no foreseeable return date.

  5. Dismissal letter

    Claimant received letter confirming dismissal effective immediately, with right of appeal.

  6. Appeal hearing

    Claimant attended appeal hearing; decision reserved.

  7. Appeal outcome letter

    Respondent upheld dismissal; claimant believed this was the actual dismissal date.

  8. Citizens Advice appointment

    Claimant sought advice and was told about the three-month time limit for tribunal claims.

  9. Early conciliation started

    Claimant contacted ACAS, more than three months after actual dismissal.

  10. Claim presented

    Claim form submitted to the tribunal.

The outcome

The tribunal dismissed the claim as out of time.

  • The actual dismissal date was 29 September 2022, not 8 November 2022 (the appeal outcome date).
  • The claimant did not seek advice until after the appeal, and the claim was filed on 6 February 2023, well over three months late.
  • The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to present the claim in time, so no extension was granted.
  • No compensation was awarded.

Lessons & takeaways

  • The three-month time limit for unfair dismissal claims runs from the effective date of termination, not the date of any internal appeal decision.
  • If you are unsure about the deadline, seek advice from ACAS or a solicitor as soon as possible after dismissal, not after the appeal.
  • Relying on a mistaken belief about the correct date is not a valid excuse for missing the time limit.
  • Even if you are a good employee and the employer treats you fairly, you must still meet the time limit to bring a claim.

This case shows how a simple misunderstanding about dates can cost an employee their right to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The claimant, a crane operator and warehouse assistant, was dismissed on 29 September 2022 after a long period of sick leave. He believed the dismissal did not take effect until his internal appeal was rejected on 8 November 2022. By the time he contacted ACAS and filed his claim, the three-month deadline from the original dismissal had passed.

What the tribunal decided

The tribunal had to decide whether the claim was presented in time. The law is clear: the time limit runs from the effective date of termination, which is the date the employer ends the contract. An internal appeal does not change that date. The claimant presented his claim on 6 February 2023, more than three months after 29 September 2022. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for him to present the claim in time, so no extension was granted.

What could have been done differently

The claimant did not seek advice until after the appeal concluded, despite having access to Citizens Advice and the internet. He and his partner assumed the appeal outcome was the dismissal date, but they did not check. The tribunal noted that the claimant had a good grasp of English and could have asked about time limits earlier. If he had contacted ACAS or a solicitor immediately after the dismissal letter, he would have been within the deadline.

Why this matters

This case is a reminder that time limits are strict and ignorance of the law is not a defence. Employees who are dismissed should not wait for an appeal to finish before seeking advice about tribunal claims. The three-month clock starts ticking from the day you are told your employment is ending, not from the final appeal decision. Even if you are a valued employee and the dismissal seems unfair, you must act quickly to preserve your right to challenge it.

Similar cases

Claim dismissed · Jul 2023

Unfair dismissal claim struck out: waiting for internal appeal and personal tragedy didn't extend time limit

A 12-year employee who waited until after his internal appeal to bring an unfair dismissal claim was out of time. The tribunal rejected arguments that his wife's stillbirth and his own ignorance of procedure made it not reasonably practicable to claim earlier.

gross-misconducttime-limitreasonably-practicable
Claim dismissed · Dec 2023

Cleaning operative's unfair dismissal claims dismissed as out of time

A cleaning operative who filed two unfair dismissal claims after the three-month deadline has had both claims dismissed. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable for him to have filed in time.

health-safetyunfair-dismissaltime-limit
Claim dismissed · Oct 2023

Unfair dismissal claim struck out after email submission ignored automatic reply

A former employee's unfair dismissal claim was struck out as out of time after she emailed her ET1 form and failed to read the tribunal's automatic reply stating that claims cannot be accepted by email.

time-limitreasonably-practicablemistaken-belief
Respondent won · Sept 2023

Constructive dismissal claim allowed to proceed despite being five days late

An estate agency employee who mistakenly emailed her claim form to ACAS instead of the tribunal has been given permission to proceed with her constructive unfair dismissal claim, even though it arrived five days after the deadline.

constructive-dismissaltime-limitreasonably-practicable