Claim dismissed Employment Tribunal · 8 December 2022

Disability discrimination claim struck out for failing to follow tribunal orders

A former employee's disability discrimination claim against Sodexo Limited was struck out after she repeatedly failed to provide ordered medical information. The tribunal found no reasonable excuse for the non-compliance.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant presented a claim form on 12 November 2021 including a disability discrimination claim.
  • The tribunal ordered the claimant to provide specific information on the disability discrimination claim by 27 April 2022.
  • The claimant did not comply with the order despite reminders and a strike out warning.
  • The claimant had health issues and was unrepresented for a time.
  • The disability discrimination claim was struck out for non-compliance with the tribunal order.
  • The remaining claims for race and age discrimination and public interest disclosure continue.

Timeline

  1. Claim presented

    The claimant presented her claim form, bringing claims for race and age discrimination, public interest disclosure detriment, and disability discrimination.

  2. Tribunal order for information

    The tribunal ordered the claimant to provide specific information on the disability discrimination claim by 27 April 2022, including details of impairment, impact statement, and medical records.

  3. Trade union representative withdraws

    The claimant's trade union representative notified the tribunal they were no longer representing the claimant.

  4. Strike out warning letter

    The tribunal sent a letter to the claimant informing her that the judge was considering striking out the disability discrimination claim and giving her until 27 June 2022 to respond.

  5. Claimant emails tribunal

    The claimant sent an email explaining delays due to her representative's withdrawal and cataract surgery, but did not provide the ordered information.

  6. Preliminary hearing postponed

    A preliminary hearing was listed but postponed to 6 December 2022 due to insufficient time.

  7. Preliminary hearing

    The hearing took place to decide whether to strike out the disability discrimination claim. The claimant had still not fully complied with the order.

  8. Judgment issued

    Employment Judge Manley struck out the disability discrimination claim for non-compliance with the tribunal order.

The outcome

The tribunal decided to strike out the disability discrimination claim. The key reason was that the claimant had not provided the ordered information about her impairment, impact statement, and medical records, despite multiple reminders and a strike-out warning. The tribunal found that the claimant's health issues and loss of representation did not justify the prolonged non-compliance. No compensation was awarded as the claim was dismissed at a preliminary stage.

Lessons & takeaways

  • Always comply with tribunal orders by the deadline, even if you are unrepresented or unwell.
  • If you cannot meet a deadline, apply for an extension before it passes, not after.
  • Keep the tribunal informed of any changes in your representation or health that affect your ability to comply.
  • A strike-out warning is a final chance — ignoring it can end your claim entirely.

A cautionary tale about tribunal deadlines

This case shows how failing to follow a tribunal's instructions can derail a discrimination claim, even if the underlying complaint has merit. The former employee brought claims for race, age, and disability discrimination, as well as whistleblowing detriment. But her disability claim was struck out before it could be heard on its merits.

The tribunal had ordered her to provide specific details about her disability, including medical records, by 27 April 2022. She did not comply. Even after a strike-out warning letter in June, she only sent a brief email explaining delays due to her representative's withdrawal and cataract surgery — but still no information. By the time of the hearing in December, she had started an impact statement and provided some medical evidence, but it was too late.

What the respondent did right

Sodexo Limited's solicitors acted promptly, writing to the tribunal twice to request an 'unless order' and then seeking confirmation of strike-out. They followed the correct procedural steps, which made it difficult for the claimant to argue unfairness.

What the claimant could have done differently

The claimant's health problems and loss of representation were genuine difficulties, but the tribunal noted she could have asked for more time before the deadline expired. Instead, she waited months before engaging. By then, the tribunal had lost patience. The lesson is clear: if you are struggling to comply, tell the tribunal early and ask for help — don't wait for a strike-out warning.

Why this matters

Employment tribunals expect parties to take orders seriously. While they can grant relief from sanction, they will not do so if the non-compliance is prolonged and unexplained. This case is a reminder that procedural rules are not optional, and ignoring them can cost you your claim — regardless of its strength.

Similar cases

Respondent won · Jul 2023

Senior academic ordered to pay £1,000 costs after failing to comply with tribunal order

A highly qualified academic who failed to provide a supplemental impact statement as ordered by the tribunal has been ordered to pay £1,000 in costs. The tribunal found his conduct unreasonable and that it caused a hearing to be postponed.

costsunreasonable-conductfailure-to-comply
Claim dismissed · Jun 2023

Claim struck out after employee failed to provide any details of her case

A former employee's claim for constructive dismissal and disability discrimination was struck out after she repeatedly failed to comply with tribunal orders to provide particulars of her allegations.

strike-outfailure-to-complynon-attendance
Claim dismissed · Jun 2023

Claim dismissed after failing to comply with Unless Order: a cautionary tale

A former employee's claims for constructive dismissal, disability discrimination and protected disclosure detriment were struck out after she failed to comply with an Unless Order requiring further details of her complaints.

unless-orderstrike-outfailure-to-comply
Claim dismissed · Apr 2023

Disability discrimination claim struck out after failure to provide further information

A former employee's disability discrimination claim against GXO Logistics Drinks Ltd was struck out after he repeatedly failed to comply with tribunal orders to provide details of his claim. His unfair dismissal claim was also dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to insufficient service.

disability-discriminationunfair-dismissallack-of-jurisdiction