Claimant won £36,087 awarded Employment Tribunal · 26 April 2023

Estate director wins constructive dismissal after grievance ignored and fraud allegation unsubstantiated

An estate director with six years' service resigned after his employer failed to investigate his grievance and made an unsubstantiated fraud allegation. The tribunal awarded £36,087.48 for constructive unfair dismissal, with a 25% uplift for breaching the ACAS code.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant's first grievance against a board member was upheld but never implemented.
  • The respondent made an unsubstantiated allegation of fraud/bribery against the claimant and did not investigate it.
  • The claimant's second grievance was promised to be investigated but was ignored.
  • The respondent failed to provide the claimant with documents needed for his defence before a disciplinary hearing.
  • The respondent had predetermined the claimant's guilt before the disciplinary hearing.
  • The claimant resigned on 11 September 2018 due to the cumulative breaches of trust and confidence.

Timeline

  1. Employment commenced

    Claimant started work as estate director for the respondent.

  2. First grievance raised

    Claimant raised a formal grievance against Ms Onayemi for baseless accusations.

  3. First grievance upheld

    Investigator Mr Anderson found the claimant's grievance was well-founded; all four complaints upheld.

  4. Mr McGarry appointed chair

    Mr McGarry became chairperson of the board; he was ill-disposed towards the claimant.

  5. Fraud/bribery allegation raised

    Mr McGarry emailed claimant suggesting possible breach of Fraud Act and Bribery Act, but never investigated.

  6. Second grievance raised

    Claimant raised grievance against the board for inaction on first grievance and other issues.

  7. Second suspension and incident

    Claimant was verbally suspended; a physical altercation occurred with Mr McGarry; police called.

  8. Subject access request

    Claimant requested documents for his defence; respondent did not respond.

  9. Resignation

    Claimant resigned, citing the respondent's failure to provide documents as the final straw.

  10. Substantive hearing began

    Employment tribunal heard the case over six days.

  11. Remedy hearing

    Tribunal awarded £36,087.48 compensation for constructive unfair dismissal.

The outcome

The tribunal found that the claimant was constructively unfairly dismissed. The respondent had breached the implied term of trust and confidence by a series of acts: failing to implement the upheld first grievance, making a baseless fraud/bribery allegation without investigation, ignoring the second grievance, and denying the claimant documents for his disciplinary hearing. The tribunal held that the claimant did not contribute to his dismissal and that no Polkey reduction applied. The award was increased by 25% due to the respondent's unreasonable failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures.

Compensation:

  • Total award: £36,087.48

Lessons & takeaways

  • If your employer upholds a grievance but fails to implement the outcome, this can form part of a pattern of conduct that destroys trust and confidence.
  • Making an unsubstantiated allegation of fraud or bribery without investigation is a serious breach of trust that can justify resignation.
  • Failing to respond to a subject access request for documents needed for a disciplinary hearing is a procedural failure that tribunals view very seriously.
  • Ignoring a second grievance after promising to investigate it can be the final straw in a constructive dismissal claim.
  • A 25% uplift in compensation is possible if the employer unreasonably fails to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures.

When trust breaks down: a case of cumulative failures

This case shows how a series of employer failings, each perhaps not fatal on its own, can together destroy the trust and confidence needed for an employment relationship to continue. The estate director had worked for the respondent for six years when he raised a grievance against a board member for baseless accusations. That grievance was upheld, but the findings were never implemented. The new board chair then made an unsubstantiated allegation of fraud and bribery against the claimant, which was never investigated.

What the employer did wrong

The respondent's conduct went beyond poor management. It failed to investigate the claimant's second grievance despite promising to do so. It suspended the claimant without following its own disciplinary policy, and then denied him documents needed to prepare his defence for a disciplinary hearing. The tribunal found that the respondent had predetermined the claimant's guilt. When the claimant resigned, citing the failure to provide documents as the final straw, the tribunal held that the cumulative breaches of trust and confidence entitled him to do so.

Why this matters for similar claims

For employees considering a constructive dismissal claim, this case illustrates that the final straw can be relatively minor if it follows a series of earlier breaches. The tribunal also applied a 25% uplift to the compensation because the respondent unreasonably failed to follow the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures. Employers should note that ignoring grievances, making unsubstantiated allegations, and denying procedural fairness can lead to significant compensation awards.

Similar cases