Respondent won Employment Tribunal · 16 January 2023

Less than two years' service: conditional offer and unpaid shadowing did not count

A leisure centre attendant who was dismissed after less than two years' continuous employment could not bring an unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal ruled his employment started only when he began his first paid shift, not when he did unpaid job shadowing.

1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026

Case details

Key facts

  • The claimant was offered work as an attendant on 16 October 2019, conditional on satisfactory references.
  • The claimant undertook 2 hours of unpaid job shadowing while references were awaited.
  • The final satisfactory reference was received on 15 January 2020, and the claimant started his first shift on 16 January 2020.
  • On 13 December 2021, the respondent told the claimant he would not be offered further shifts due to issues raised by the school.
  • The claimant's continuous employment was less than two years from 16 January 2020 to 13 December 2021.

Timeline

  1. Conditional job offer

    The respondent offered the claimant work as an attendant, conditional on satisfactory references.

  2. Unpaid job shadowing

    The claimant undertook 2 hours of unpaid job shadowing while references were awaited.

  3. References received

    The final satisfactory reference was received by the respondent.

  4. First paid shift

    The claimant commenced his first paid shift, which the tribunal found to be the start of continuous employment.

  5. Dismissal communicated

    Mr Paris told the claimant he would not be offered further shifts due to issues raised by Cramlington Learning Village.

  6. Last day of work

    The claimant completed no work after the conversation on 13 December 2021.

  7. Claim form presented

    The claimant presented his claim for unfair dismissal and breach of contract.

  8. Hearing

    The tribunal heard the case, including a preliminary issue on length of service.

  9. Judgment issued

    The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim and the breach of contract claim was withdrawn.

The outcome

The tribunal dismissed the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant had less than two years' continuous employment. The breach of contract claim was withdrawn by the claimant.

  • The claimant was offered a conditional job on 16 October 2019 and did 2 hours of unpaid job shadowing while references were awaited.
  • Satisfactory references were received on 15 January 2020, and his first paid shift was on 16 January 2020.
  • The tribunal held that continuous employment began on 16 January 2020, so from that date to his dismissal on 13 December 2021, he had less than two years' service.

Lessons & takeaways

  • If you are offered a job conditionally, your continuous employment usually starts when you begin work under the contract, not when you do unpaid activities like job shadowing.
  • To claim unfair dismissal, you generally need at least two years' continuous service. Check your start date carefully if you had a conditional offer or unpaid trial period.
  • If you are dismissed before reaching two years' service, you may still have other claims (e.g., discrimination or breach of contract) but not unfair dismissal.
  • Keep records of your first paid shift and any communications about your start date – they can be crucial in determining your length of service.

When does employment really start?

This case shows how important the precise start date of employment can be for employees with less than two years' service. The claimant, a leisure centre attendant, was offered a job conditional on references. He did two hours of unpaid job shadowing while waiting for the references to come through. The tribunal had to decide whether that shadowing counted as the start of his continuous employment.

The tribunal applied established case law: 'starting work' means beginning work under the contract of employment, not doing unpaid activities collateral to it. Because the job offer was conditional and the shadowing was unpaid and done before references were cleared, the employment only began on his first paid shift. That meant he fell just short of the two-year qualifying period for unfair dismissal when he was dismissed.

What the employer did right

Active Northumberland was represented by counsel and successfully argued that the claimant's service was too short. The tribunal agreed, noting that the unpaid shadowing was not work under the contract. This is a reminder that employers should clearly document when employment actually begins, especially when there are pre-employment conditions.

What this means for similar claims

For employees, the lesson is clear: unpaid trial shifts or shadowing before your contract is finalised do not count towards your length of service. If you are dismissed before two years, you cannot claim ordinary unfair dismissal – though you may still have other rights if the dismissal was for a discriminatory reason or involved a breach of contract. For employers, ensuring that start dates are correctly recorded can prevent disputes over the qualifying period.

Similar cases

Claim dismissed · Jan 2023

Group CTO denied unfair dismissal claim after consultancy period excluded from service

A group chief technology officer who worked for a company via his own limited company before becoming an employee was unable to claim unfair dismissal because his continuous service fell short of two years.

consultancy-agreementservice-companycontinuous-employment
Claim dismissed · Dec 2023

Race discrimination claim dismissed as out of time: a lesson in tribunal deadlines

A Branch Care Manager's claim for direct race discrimination and victimisation was dismissed because she presented it 28 days late. The tribunal refused to extend time, finding no just and equitable reason.

direct-race-discriminationvictimisationout-of-time
Respondent won · Dec 2023

Production operative dismissed during long-term sick leave: unfair dismissal claim fails on service

A production operative who was dismissed while on sick leave for plantar fasciitis and depression lost her unfair dismissal claim because she had less than two years' service. All disability discrimination claims were also dismissed.

disability-discriminationunfair-dismissallong-term-sickness
Claim dismissed · Nov 2023

Founder's unfair dismissal claim struck out: no continuous employment before TUPE transfer

A former CEO who founded the business could not show he was an employee of the transferor company, so his unfair dismissal claim was struck out for lack of continuous service.

tupe-transferemployee-statusdirector-as-employee