Operations manager with asthma placed on short-time work during lockdown: constructive dismissal and disability discrimination
An operations manager with asthma was constructively dismissed after being placed on short-time work for raising health and safety concerns during the first COVID-19 lockdown. The tribunal awarded £27,871 in damages.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #asthma-disability
- #constructive-dismissal
- #health-and-safety-detriment
- #short-time-working
- #acas-code-uplift
- #covid-19
Key facts
- The claimant started work as Office Manager in October 2019 and was promoted to Operations Manager in February 2020.
- The claimant has asthma, which the tribunal found to be a disability under the Equality Act 2010.
- On 17 March 2020, the claimant informed the respondent she was vulnerable due to asthma and requested to work from home.
- The respondent allowed home working but on 25 March 2020 placed the claimant on short-time working of 8 hours per week.
- The tribunal found the short-time working was a reaction to the claimant's health and safety concerns and her disability.
- The claimant resigned on 11 May 2020 citing loss of trust and confidence.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Claimant started as Office Manager/Secretary at Demicon Ltd.
-
Promotion to Operations Manager
Claimant promoted to Operations Manager with additional health and safety responsibilities.
-
Annual leave started
Claimant went on annual leave, returning on 18 March 2020.
-
Government announcement
UK Government advised working from home where possible; claimant heard this while on holiday.
-
Claimant emailed respondent
Claimant informed respondent she was vulnerable due to asthma and requested to work from home.
-
Meeting with director
Claimant attended office, discussed working from home and raised health and safety concerns; respondent allowed home working.
-
Lockdown announced
Prime Minister announced stay-at-home order; only essential travel to work permitted.
-
Placed on short-time working
Respondent emailed claimant reducing her hours to 8 per week, effective 26 March 2020.
-
Formal warning issued
Claimant received a formal warning for submitting timesheets indicating availability to work.
-
Resignation
Claimant resigned, citing loss of trust and confidence due to respondent's conduct.
-
Employment ended
Claimant's notice period ended.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the claimant was constructively dismissed and whether the dismissal was automatically unfair because the principal reason was her raising health and safety concerns. It also had to determine if the respondent subjected her to detriment and disability discrimination by placing her on short-time working.
The outcome
The tribunal upheld the claimant's complaints of detriment for health and safety activities, discrimination arising from disability, breach of contract (constructive dismissal), and unauthorised deduction from wages.
- The short-time working was a direct response to the claimant's health and safety concerns and her disability (asthma).
- The respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments or properly consider alternatives.
- The claimant was awarded £27,871.03 in total damages, including compensation for injury to feelings and financial losses.
Lessons & takeaways
- Employees with less than two years' service can still claim automatic unfair dismissal if the reason relates to health and safety or discrimination.
- Placing an employee on short-time work because they raised health and safety concerns is likely to be seen as detrimental treatment.
- Employers must consider reasonable adjustments for disabled employees, especially during a pandemic, before imposing changes to working hours.
- A constructive dismissal claim can succeed even if the employee resigns shortly after the employer's conduct, provided trust and confidence are destroyed.
This case highlights the risks employers face when responding to an employee's health and safety concerns, particularly during a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic. The claimant, an operations manager with asthma, was placed on short-time work of just eight hours per week days after she requested to work from home due to her vulnerability. The tribunal found that this was not a neutral business decision but a reaction to her raising health and safety issues and her disability.
What the employer could have done differently
The respondent could have engaged with the claimant's concerns, considered alternative arrangements such as full-time home working, and explored whether her health and safety role could be performed remotely. Instead, they imposed a drastic reduction in hours without proper consultation, which the tribunal saw as a fundamental breach of trust and confidence. The respondent also issued a formal warning for submitting timesheets indicating availability, further undermining the relationship.
Why this result matters
This decision confirms that employees with less than two years' service are not left without protection if they are dismissed for raising health and safety concerns or because of disability. The tribunal applied the automatic unfair dismissal provisions under section 100 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which do not require a qualifying period. It also serves as a reminder that disability discrimination claims can succeed even in the early stages of employment, and that employers must take reasonable steps to avoid putting disabled employees at a disadvantage.
Similar cases
Constructive dismissal after eight-month wait for grievance outcome
An NHS employee resigned after waiting nearly eight months for her grievance outcome. The tribunal found she was constructively unfairly dismissed and awarded £3,756.60.
Demoted without consultation: constructive dismissal after 20 years' service
A long-serving installations manager was constructively dismissed after being demoted twice without consultation. The tribunal awarded £24,331.
Social worker's race discrimination claim over 'aggressive' stereotype dismissed
A black social worker with 15 years' service lost her claims of race discrimination and constructive dismissal after an altercation with a white colleague. The tribunal found no evidence of stereotyping or unfair treatment.
Before and after school club leader loses Covid-19 safety dismissal claim
A before and after school club leader who refused to attend work during the pandemic claiming serious and imminent danger has lost her unfair dismissal claim. The tribunal found her belief was not reasonable given the school's risk assessments.
