ADHD disclosure ignored and mother refused as companion: disability discrimination win
A tribunal found that Climar Industries Ltd discriminated against an installer with ADHD by refusing to allow his mother to accompany him at a disciplinary hearing and dismissing him for behaviour linked to his disability.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Case details
- #adhd
- #reasonable-adjustments
- #disciplinary-hearing-accompaniment
- #dismissal
- #discrimination-arising-from-disability
Key facts
- The claimant has ADHD and his mother was his medical carer.
- The claimant was dismissed for wasting company time by not challenging his line manager.
- The respondent refused to allow the claimant's mother to accompany him at the disciplinary hearing.
- The respondent had actual knowledge of the claimant's ADHD from 18 November 2020.
- The claimant's lack of self-confidence and need to be liked arose from his ADHD and led to his dismissal.
Timeline
-
Employment started
The claimant started employment as an accredited installer/fitter.
-
Probation passed
The claimant passed his probationary review with a very high standard of work.
-
Line manager dismissed
The claimant's line manager, Mr Williams, was dismissed for failing to meet objectives.
-
Claimant suspended
The claimant was suspended pending an investigation into allegations.
-
Investigatory meeting
The claimant disclosed his ADHD medication to Mr Morris and HR.
-
Request for mother to attend disciplinary
The claimant requested his mother attend the disciplinary hearing; request denied.
-
Disciplinary hearing
The claimant attended a disciplinary hearing; his mother was not allowed in.
-
Dismissal
The claimant was dismissed with a payment in lieu of notice for misconduct.
-
Appeal letter
The claimant appealed, explaining his ADHD affected his behaviour.
-
Appeal hearing
The appeal hearing took place; the claimant's mother was allowed to attend.
-
Occupational health report
Dr Sperber's report confirmed the claimant's ADHD and its effects.
-
Claim form issued
The ET1 claim form was presented to the tribunal.
The legal issue
The tribunal had to decide whether the employer knew about the employee's ADHD and, if so, whether it should have allowed his mother to accompany him at the disciplinary hearing as a reasonable adjustment, and whether the dismissal for 'wasting time' was unfavourable treatment because of something arising from his disability.
The outcome
The tribunal found that Climar Industries Ltd had actual knowledge of the claimant's ADHD from 18 November 2020, when he disclosed his medication during an investigatory meeting. Despite this, the company refused his request to have his mother accompany him at the disciplinary hearing on 14 December 2020, which the tribunal said was a failure to make a reasonable adjustment.
The tribunal also ruled that the dismissal itself was discriminatory. The claimant's lack of self-confidence and need to be liked – traits linked to his ADHD – led him not to challenge his line manager's instructions, which the employer treated as 'wasting company time'. This unfavourable treatment arose from his disability.
No compensation was awarded at this stage; the remedy hearing is yet to be scheduled. The judgment only determined liability.
Lessons & takeaways
- If you have a disability like ADHD, disclose it clearly in writing to HR and your manager so the employer has actual knowledge of your condition.
- Employers must consider reasonable adjustments for disciplinary hearings, such as allowing a family member or support person if needed due to a disability.
- Dismissing an employee for behaviour caused by their disability – such as failing to challenge a manager due to low self-confidence – can amount to discrimination arising from disability.
- Keep a record of all requests for adjustments and the employer's responses; this evidence is crucial in tribunal claims.
What this case shows
This case highlights how employers can fall foul of disability discrimination law when they ignore a disclosed condition and refuse simple adjustments. The claimant, an accredited installer with ADHD, had passed his probation with high marks. But after his line manager was dismissed, he was suspended and later fired for 'wasting company time' – essentially for not challenging his new manager's instructions.
The tribunal heard that the claimant's ADHD made him lack self-confidence and want to be liked, which led him to comply rather than push back. When he asked for his mother – his medical carer – to accompany him at the disciplinary hearing, the employer said no. Yet they knew about his ADHD from a meeting weeks earlier.
What the employer could have done differently
Climar Industries Ltd could have avoided liability by treating the claimant's disclosure seriously. Allowing his mother to attend the hearing would have been a simple, low-cost adjustment. They also could have considered whether his behaviour at work was linked to his disability before deciding to dismiss. Instead, they pressed ahead with a process that the tribunal found was not adjusted to his needs.
Why this matters
The case is a reminder that reasonable adjustments aren't just about physical changes to the workplace. They can include allowing a support person at a meeting, especially when the employee's disability affects their ability to represent themselves. It also shows that dismissing someone for conduct caused by their disability – even if the employer sees it as misconduct – can be unlawful discrimination. For employees with hidden disabilities like ADHD, this decision reinforces that disclosure should trigger a duty to adjust, not a dismissal.
Similar cases
Handyman loses constructive dismissal claim over ADHD adjustments
A handyman with ADHD resigned claiming constructive dismissal after alleged bullying and failure to make adjustments. The tribunal found no fundamental breach of trust and confidence, and the claim failed.
Delivery driver dismissed for lateness: ADHD discrimination claim fails
A delivery driver with ADHD was dismissed for persistent lateness while on a final warning. The tribunal rejected her claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination, finding the employer acted reasonably.
26-year service, long-term sickness: capability dismissal upheld by tribunal
A Visual Merchandising Team Manager with 26 years' service was dismissed after over six months' absence. The tribunal rejected her claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination.
Support worker with osteoarthritis denied reasonable adjustments after furlough wins discrimination claim
A support worker with osteoarthritis was discriminated against by her employer, a disability charity, which failed to make reasonable adjustments and treated her less favourably than a non-disabled colleague after furlough. The tribunal upheld her disability discrimination claims but dismissed her constructive unfair dismissal claim.
