Support worker's claim dismissed for presenting claim before ACAS certificate
A support worker who presented her tribunal claim one day before obtaining an ACAS early conciliation certificate had her case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, despite later rectifying the error.
1 min read · Last updated 18 May 2026
Key facts
- The claimant presented her claim form on 4 August 2020 without an ACAS early conciliation certificate.
- She obtained an early conciliation certificate on 5 August 2020, one day after presenting her claim.
- The claimant applied for reconsideration on 17 April 2021, enclosing the certificate.
- The Employment Judge found the circumstances indistinguishable from Pryce v Baxterstorey.
- The tribunal had no discretion to waive the breach of s.18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996.
Timeline
-
Employment started
Claimant began work as a support worker for the respondent.
-
Formal warning issued
Claimant received a formal warning that dismissal could follow if performance did not improve.
-
Dismissal
Claimant was dismissed for failing her probation period.
-
Claim form presented
Claimant presented her claim form to the tribunal without an ACAS early conciliation certificate.
-
ACAS certificate obtained
Claimant obtained an early conciliation certificate from ACAS.
-
Appeal hearing
Claimant's appeal against dismissal was heard and upheld.
-
Claim rejected
Tribunal rejected the claim under Rule 12(1)(c) for failure to complete ACAS conciliation.
-
Reconsideration application
Claimant applied for reconsideration, enclosing the ACAS certificate.
-
Claim accepted after reconsideration
Tribunal accepted the claim as received on 17 April 2021.
-
Preliminary hearing
Tribunal dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction due to failure to obtain ACAS certificate before presenting claim.
The legal issue
Whether the tribunal could accept a claim where the claimant obtained the ACAS early conciliation certificate one day after presenting the claim form, and whether later submission of the certificate could retrospectively validate the claim.
The outcome
The tribunal dismissed the claim for lack of jurisdiction.
- The claimant presented her claim on 4 August 2020 without an ACAS early conciliation certificate.
- She obtained the certificate on 5 August 2020 and later applied for reconsideration, which initially led to the claim being accepted.
- At a preliminary hearing, the tribunal held that the requirement to obtain the certificate before presenting the claim is mandatory and cannot be waived, following the precedent in Pryce v Baxterstorey.
- No compensation was awarded as the claim was struck out.
Lessons & takeaways
- Always obtain an ACAS early conciliation certificate before presenting any tribunal claim — even one day's delay can be fatal.
- If you present a claim without the certificate, the tribunal has no discretion to accept it later, even if you obtain the certificate shortly after.
- Claimants with less than two years' service cannot bring unfair dismissal claims, but other claims like discrimination may still be possible if the ACAS process is followed correctly.
- If your claim is rejected, seek legal advice promptly; the tribunal's initial acceptance after reconsideration may still be overturned at a preliminary hearing.
A procedural trap that cost a support worker her day in court
This case is a stark reminder that employment tribunal claims come with strict procedural requirements — and missing one by even a single day can be fatal. The claimant, a support worker with Learning Disability Network London Limited, was dismissed after just five months. She believed she had been treated unfairly and wanted to bring claims for unfair dismissal, race discrimination, and unpaid wages.
However, when she presented her claim form on 4 August 2020, she had not yet obtained an ACAS early conciliation certificate. She got it the very next day, on 5 August 2020. Although the tribunal initially accepted the claim after she later submitted the certificate, a preliminary hearing eventually ruled that the claim could not proceed.
Why the tribunal had no choice
The law under section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 is clear: a claimant must obtain an early conciliation certificate from ACAS before presenting a claim to the tribunal. The Employment Judge found that the circumstances were indistinguishable from the case of Pryce v Baxterstorey, which established that the tribunal has no discretion to waive this requirement. Even though the claimant obtained the certificate just one day late, the claim was presented without it, and that defect could not be cured retrospectively.
What this means for similar claims
This outcome may seem harsh, but it reflects the strict approach tribunals must take. For anyone considering bringing a claim, the lesson is simple: complete the ACAS early conciliation process first, and only then submit your claim form. A delay of even 24 hours can mean losing the right to have your case heard at all. The claimant also faced the additional hurdle of having less than two years' service, which meant her unfair dismissal claim was unlikely to succeed in any event. But the procedural error alone was enough to end her case.
Similar cases
Former employee's claims dismissed as out of time despite early conciliation
A former employee's unfair dismissal and discrimination claims were struck out after the tribunal found they were presented too late, even though she had started early conciliation.
Out-of-time claims struck out: ignorance of the law is no excuse
A former employee's claims for unpaid wages and race discrimination were struck out after she presented them eight months late, believing the time limit was two years as in Italy.
Dismissed employee's claim thrown out for missing ACAS early conciliation deadline
A former employee's unfair dismissal and discrimination claims were dismissed after the tribunal found they were presented more than three months after dismissal, without ACAS early conciliation having been started in time.
Healthcare assistant's whistleblowing claim thrown out for being over two years late
A healthcare assistant who waited over two years to bring a whistleblowing and discrimination claim after his dismissal had his case dismissed as out of time. The tribunal found it was reasonably practicable to have presented the claim within the statutory time limit.
